<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modify &gt; Timeline &gt; Distribute to Layers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/</link>
	<description>code = joy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-12730</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-12730</guid>
		<description>OMG, Greg. Thanks for pointing that out. I had Flash crash on me all the time and couldn&#039;t put my finger on the problem.
ClipX rules to much to leave out. Guess I have to switch it of when Distributing to Layers..

Thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, Greg. Thanks for pointing that out. I had Flash crash on me all the time and couldn&#8217;t put my finger on the problem.<br />
ClipX rules to much to leave out. Guess I have to switch it of when Distributing to Layers..</p>
<p>Thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exasperated</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-12077</link>
		<dc:creator>Exasperated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-12077</guid>
		<description>Wow. Four years later, and the pixel-shifting bug is still here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Four years later, and the pixel-shifting bug is still here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-12000</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-12000</guid>
		<description>Thank you for pointing out that this command makes use of the copy&gt;paste. I had been running PC software called clipx. And it caused Flash to freeze whenever I tried to distribute to layers. This makes me a lot happier knowing what the problem was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for pointing out that this command makes use of the copy&gt;paste. I had been running PC software called clipx. And it caused Flash to freeze whenever I tried to distribute to layers. This makes me a lot happier knowing what the problem was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom schreiber</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-4963</link>
		<dc:creator>tom schreiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-4963</guid>
		<description>DISTRIBUTE TO LAYERS PIXEL SHIFT BUG



same here. the use of &quot;Distribute to Layers&quot; is breaking my tight layouts by shifting object a fraction of a pixel. -afterall, the command is named  &#039;distribute to layers&#039; not &#039;throw stuff around randomly&#039;

please let me know when we can expect a fix on this. would be very much appreciated.
 -tom
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DISTRIBUTE TO LAYERS PIXEL SHIFT BUG</p>
<p>same here. the use of &#8220;Distribute to Layers&#8221; is breaking my tight layouts by shifting object a fraction of a pixel. -afterall, the command is named  &#8216;distribute to layers&#8217; not &#8216;throw stuff around randomly&#8217;</p>
<p>please let me know when we can expect a fix on this. would be very much appreciated.<br />
 -tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mads</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-4962</link>
		<dc:creator>Mads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-4962</guid>
		<description>I know this post may be long dead, but I did a search for this and it turned out on top.

PIX8, I have the same annoying problem with symbols being shifted slightly after the Distribute to Layers command. Has anyone found a solution for this? Mike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this post may be long dead, but I did a search for this and it turned out on top.</p>
<p>PIX8, I have the same annoying problem with symbols being shifted slightly after the Distribute to Layers command. Has anyone found a solution for this? Mike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-4961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-4961</guid>
		<description>I actually use this in order to create video segments by importing jpg sequence format and distributing it into layers and exporting it as flash or video, I learned  it from one of the articles at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wikiverse.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wikiverse.org&lt;/a&gt; about Macromedia Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually use this in order to create video segments by importing jpg sequence format and distributing it into layers and exporting it as flash or video, I learned  it from one of the articles at <a href="http://www.wikiverse.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikiverse.org</a> about Macromedia Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McKibben</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-4960</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McKibben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-4960</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;ll stick my foot in my mouth about bug fixes, but only once its released. Now that I&#039;m aware that the next update even has a code name, there&#039;s a glimmer of hope.

Now if I could just see a bit more of a return on my DevNet subscription... 

My issue here is what I haven&#039;t gotten from my $1300 DevNet investment...compared to what I got from Microsoft for my $1100 Universal Subscription. The difference is staggering: 8 kinda neat but not so useful CDs from Macromedia vs. 30 or so DVDs with everything under the sun on them from microsoft. Would it kill macromedia to throw us a bone, or RoboDemo or something? My renewal is coming up, and I have to find some reason to drop $600... I consider properly working panels to be a bug fix - regardless of how much rewriting the flash team has to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll stick my foot in my mouth about bug fixes, but only once its released. Now that I&#8217;m aware that the next update even has a code name, there&#8217;s a glimmer of hope.</p>
<p>Now if I could just see a bit more of a return on my DevNet subscription&#8230; </p>
<p>My issue here is what I haven&#8217;t gotten from my $1300 DevNet investment&#8230;compared to what I got from Microsoft for my $1100 Universal Subscription. The difference is staggering: 8 kinda neat but not so useful CDs from Macromedia vs. 30 or so DVDs with everything under the sun on them from microsoft. Would it kill macromedia to throw us a bone, or RoboDemo or something? My renewal is coming up, and I have to find some reason to drop $600&#8230; I consider properly working panels to be a bug fix &#8211; regardless of how much rewriting the flash team has to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-4959</link>
		<dc:creator>mike chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-4959</guid>
		<description>&gt;oh yeah, it&#039;s Macromedia policy never to fix bugs

Umm... we have already released one update to 2004, and are about to release another one (with over 120 new bugs fixed).

See:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.markme.com/flashteam/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.markme.com/flashteam/&lt;/a&gt;

for more info.

mike chambers

mesh@macromedia.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>oh yeah, it&#8217;s Macromedia policy never to fix bugs</p>
<p>Umm&#8230; we have already released one update to 2004, and are about to release another one (with over 120 new bugs fixed).</p>
<p>See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.markme.com/flashteam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.markme.com/flashteam/</a></p>
<p>for more info.</p>
<p>mike chambers</p>
<p><a href="mailto:mesh@macromedia.com">mesh@macromedia.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McKibben</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McKibben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-4958</guid>
		<description>The only problem here is that, at least on the mac, the distribute to layers command actually takes over your clipboard. For example, you have two symbols on a layer: &quot;Circle&quot; and &quot;Square&quot;, you cut (Command-x) &quot;Circle&quot;, then you select &quot;Square&quot; and do a &quot;Distribute to Layers&quot;, then you paste (Command-v). Unfortunately, you paste a square, even though you&#039;ve never intentionally modified your clipboard. Your &quot;Circle&quot; is now gone. Boo.

Maybe in 7.0.2...  oh yeah, it&#039;s Macromedia policy never to fix bugs, especially for the mac. (Sorry for the complaint, but distribute to layers should definitely not eat my homework, er, clipboard)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem here is that, at least on the mac, the distribute to layers command actually takes over your clipboard. For example, you have two symbols on a layer: &#8220;Circle&#8221; and &#8220;Square&#8221;, you cut (Command-x) &#8220;Circle&#8221;, then you select &#8220;Square&#8221; and do a &#8220;Distribute to Layers&#8221;, then you paste (Command-v). Unfortunately, you paste a square, even though you&#8217;ve never intentionally modified your clipboard. Your &#8220;Circle&#8221; is now gone. Boo.</p>
<p>Maybe in 7.0.2&#8230;  oh yeah, it&#8217;s Macromedia policy never to fix bugs, especially for the mac. (Sorry for the complaint, but distribute to layers should definitely not eat my homework, er, clipboard)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanD</title>
		<link>http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2004/07/13/modify-timeline-distribute-to-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-4957</link>
		<dc:creator>DanD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 03:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=794#comment-4957</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else have a problem with Distributing to Layers shifting the distributed symbols a few tenths of a pixel one way or another in MX 2004? Especially text fields. I used to love to use this method just to autoatically name all my layers, but i noticed it started moving stuff slightly in MX 2004 on the Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else have a problem with Distributing to Layers shifting the distributed symbols a few tenths of a pixel one way or another in MX 2004? Especially text fields. I used to love to use this method just to autoatically name all my layers, but i noticed it started moving stuff slightly in MX 2004 on the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

