Comments on: Central Update Article / New Screenshot http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/ code = joy Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Nate Weiss http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2697 Nate Weiss Mon, 24 May 2004 20:47:05 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2697 Above, Mike Chambers mentions enhanced printing support in Central. Does anyone knows what he is referring to, specfically? I haven't found any mention of printing in the Central SDK or online.... Above, Mike Chambers mentions enhanced printing support in Central. Does anyone knows what he is referring to, specfically? I haven’t found any mention of printing in the Central SDK or online….

]]> By: Templates http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2696 Templates Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:06:13 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2696 Yes the fireworks built in has to be the greatest improvement of Dreamweaver .:. so much easier now Yes the fireworks built in has to be the greatest improvement of Dreamweaver .:. so much easier now

]]> By: Greg http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2695 Greg Mon, 03 Nov 2003 20:58:37 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2695 ".....I like the fact that Fireworks is built directly into to Dreamweaver....." I'm in agreement, great feature. “…..I like the fact that Fireworks is built directly into to Dreamweaver…..”

I’m in agreement, great feature.

]]> By: Hosting http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2694 Hosting Mon, 03 Nov 2003 01:00:48 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2694 Looking forward to Central. Hopefully the final RC will be stable enough for me to use. Looking forward to Central. Hopefully the final RC will be stable enough for me to use.

]]> By: Sid http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2693 Sid Mon, 03 Nov 2003 00:52:04 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2693 What do you guys think about the new Macroedia 2003 / 7. I like the fact that Fireworks is built directly into to Dreamweaver. What do you guys think about the new Macroedia 2003 / 7. I like the fact that Fireworks is built directly into to Dreamweaver.

]]> By: mike chambers http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2692 mike chambers Sat, 20 Sep 2003 21:24:48 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2692 fyi, we also have improved / enhanced printing support. We don't have support for the context menu (yet). mike chambers mesh@macromedia.com fyi, we also have improved / enhanced printing support.

We don’t have support for the context menu (yet).

mike chambers

mesh@macromedia.com

]]> By: Peter Hall http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2691 Peter Hall Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:17:38 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2691 Thanks. Really, Player 6.0.79 has a lot in common with 7.0 and those add-ons are really cool. It would be nice though to have access to features like PrintJob, ContextMenu and so on. If those features are already part of Central then it isn't much different from FP7 anyway... The only problem then would be that you couldn't use a swf7 in Central. That's a little bit annoying if you wanted to re-use parts of an app in Central and in an ordinary online version. Thanks.

Really, Player 6.0.79 has a lot in common with 7.0 and those add-ons are really cool. It would be nice though to have access to features like PrintJob, ContextMenu and so on. If those features are already part of Central then it isn’t much different from FP7 anyway…

The only problem then would be that you couldn’t use a swf7 in Central. That’s a little bit annoying if you wanted to re-use parts of an app in Central and in an ordinary online version.

]]> By: mike chambers http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2690 mike chambers Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:11:24 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2690 Well, the main reason is that we started development way before the Flash 7 player was in any state to use. If we would have included Flash 7 player, development would have been more difficult as we would have to incorprate changes to the Flash 7 code base, as well as our own changes and optimizations that we are adding. Also, I would think of Central as being on Flash Player 6++, as we have added a lot of the performance optimizations from the Flash 7 player, as well as a number of other features and APIs (tooltips, web services API, dynamically loading progressive jpgs and gifs, etc...). hope that helps... mike chambers mesh@macromedia.com Well, the main reason is that we started development way before the Flash 7 player was in any state to use.

If we would have included Flash 7 player, development would have been more difficult as we would have to incorprate changes to the Flash 7 code base, as well as our own changes and optimizations that we are adding.

Also, I would think of Central as being on Flash Player 6++, as we have added a lot of the performance optimizations from the Flash 7 player, as well as a number of other features and APIs (tooltips, web services API, dynamically loading progressive jpgs and gifs, etc…).

hope that helps…

mike chambers

mesh@macromedia.com

]]> By: Peter Hall http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2003/09/19/central-update-article-new-screenshot/comment-page-1/#comment-2689 Peter Hall Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:37:59 +0000 http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/?p=600#comment-2689 What is the reasoning behind basing Central around the Flash 6 player? What is the reasoning behind basing Central around the Flash 6 player?

]]>